[linux-audio-user] Re: [Jackit-devel] Ahh

[Steve Harris]

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:46:16 +0100, Tim Hall wrote:
> On Thursday 15 May 2003 11:20, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I have been considering a mailing list so I can get consensus on bug
> > reports, if there are enough interested people I'l set one up.
> 
> I've only just started using the swh & ladspa plug-ins in conjunction with 
> 'sweep'. While we're on this thread my immediate reaction is to the general 
> labelling - great if you're an engineer - a bit confusing if you're 'just' a 
> musician trying to make the best of a previously analogue recording. It would 
> be useful to have a plain language description of what the plug-in is 
> supposed to do when you bring it up and also what units you're entering, 
> possibly with a suggested range.

This is a valid point. One problem is that I generaly design them assuming
that there will be a UI at some point, but this has never happened.
 
> Scuse if this is a bit OT, and yes, you're damn right, I didn't RTFM yet :-)

http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa-swh/docs/ladspa-swh.html ;)

the docs could definatly do with work though.

- Steve