[linux-audio-user] New Asus Ath. XP 2500 Delta 1010LT performance

[Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen]

"Ben":
> 
> I can't tell you what is causing this but you probably won't get a
> noticeable improvement by switching from 48 to 96 kHz.  Your speaker
> system (and your ears) are probably incapable of resolving >20kHz
> signals in a live PA-type situation.  Audio professionals ( mixers,
> mastering engineers, etc - not manufacturers ) are still undecided
> whether higher sampling rates is a good thing.

My impression is that the more maths an audio professional knows, the more
sure the audio professional is that higher sampling rates is a
bad thing. (unless you are recording sounds that is later going to be 
downsampled a lot of course)

Perhaps its impossible for us non-skilled-mathematicians to
understand properly why 96 kHz is a bad thing...


--