[linux-audio-user] [ANN] QAMix 0.0.7e

Ivica Ico Bukvic ico at fuse.net
Thu May 27 00:26:41 EDT 2004


Hi all,

Just to let you know that although I've been out of the loop regarding this
matter, just from reading this last post by Dave, I realized that many of
these things are already doable in RTMix (except for the obvious lack of
alsa's sequencer which obviously makes it relatively useless, but this
should be fixed soon).

Best wishes,

Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor
http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces at music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces at music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Phillips
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:25 PM
> To: A list for linux audio users
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] [ANN] QAMix 0.0.7e
> 
> Greetings:
> 
>   Regarding MIDI data filtering, here are some ideas:
> 
>     Rechannelizing: The ability to redefine and limit channel reception
> (i.e., allow only one specific channel through, redirect channel 1 to
> channel 10, etc.)
>     Mapping: Map anything to anything, no matter how apparently
> ridiculous it may seem. Velocity to mod, volume to aftertouch, note-on
> to controller message, whatever). Only sysex messages are immune. ;)
>     Blocking: Stop reception of a certain data type, e.g., running
> status bytes, program changes, etc.
>     Set MIDI delay, arpeggiation, range filtering & restriction, etc.
> 
>   This question has come up before when I was surprised to find how
> difficult it was to access *only* the drums from the Fluid soundfont via
> Qsynth. Some synths are good about channelization, others aren't, so it
> would be nice to have the means to set MIDI channel reception
> externally. I keep coming back to the notion of the programmable MIDI
> patch bay, or something like the Yamaha MEP4 (a MIDI event processing
> unit, much fun).
> 
> Best,
> 
> dp
> 
> 
> Russell Hanaghan wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:41, Matthias Nagorni wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, 26 May 2004, Russell Hanaghan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I there plans in the future to integrate the midi functions into the
> gui
> >>>
> >>>
> >>This is a good point. In principle the MIDI bindings should be defined
> in
> >>a separate place, outside of the XML gui description. A dialog similar
> to
> >>the ams control center would be nice. I'll have a look...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Actually, this is exactly what was in my mind. The AMS midi "parameters"
> >and setting section is VERY usefull for CC, Prog Change, etc. That would
> >be even Awesome..er! :)
> >
> >
> >
> >>>and possibly some midi filters too?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Which midi filters ? For mixer control ? Or general midi filters ?
> >>BTW I have written a QMidiRoute utility which is a simple midi filter.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Mostly, my thought was some filtering that might change one CC to
> >another or even possibly prog changes to CC?
> >
> >
> >
> >>Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >






More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list