[linux-audio-user] new song on-line

[Dave Phillips]

R Parker wrote:

>I really like Luke's suggestions. Very sensible pop
>arrangement ideas. A month or so back, my studio
>partner Bill Bailey, mentioned Peter Gabriel and his
>drum production. I heard Sledge Hammer at a sound
>check and didn't listen closely but I think if you
>studied Gabriel's drum production you would find that
>there isn't one cymbal hit in that song--I'm not
>absolutely certain about that. So, what was he
>thinking:
>
>Part of Gabriel's success is his production and sound.
>He has a loud in your face style. Cymbals are loud
>announcements and Gabriel has vocals in all the spots
>where cymbals belong but the vocals are more
>important. Solution; no cymbals. You think?
>
PG's decision re: the cymbals was a very commented-upon move at that 
time. It's also worth noting that:

    Cymbals are rich in high frequencies, they cover a lot of sonic area 
that is exposed without them. When these areas are open new 
possibilities arise, including simply leaving the space open. African 
percussion is glorious in its resources, but I don't think cymbals 
figure very prominently. Cymbals are actually an interesting technology, 
and I don't think the metallurgy was available to African instrument 
designers.
    So perhaps PG simply wanted to redesign the sonic space in a more 
African style ? Leaving out the cymbals is guaranteed to open up areas 
that could be filled with something else or just left open too.
    I love his songs and his arranging skills, not to mention the fact 
that he gets some great players on his sessions...

>In contrast, Dave's song is an entirely different
>style of music but it has the same considerations of
>every song including Sledge Hammer. So we make
>decisions when arranging music; what instrument best
>dictates the fell for any given part and if drums,
>then everyone supports the drummer. If vocals then
>everyone supports the vocal part.
>
Yep, it's the song for me (if that's what I'm focused on). I'm typically 
telling guitarists that I don't give a damn how well they play their 
!@#%ing instrument, I want them to play the *song*.

When Fuzzy Samuels (bassist for CSN&Y, Manassas, Taj Mahal, etc.) worked 
with me I noticed that he knew the words to every song I sang. I remind 
players of that, because it indicates that for Fuzz the song came first. 
Exactly how is an instrumentalist supposed to know what sort of drama to 
add to the song if they don't even know what it's about ?!

Obviously for other kinds of music I have different criteria.

>In my own ignorant tractor repairman way, I like to
>consider full orchestral arrangements. How many string
>players and how many parts; 12 players and one part?
>The most talented audio engineers in the world can't
>make 12 selfish fools sound good. To book, imagine
>some poor construction worker trying to hum the
>melodies of 12 fools.
>
I'm not completely sure I understand this illustration, but it *is* 
colorful... ;-)

Thanks for the comments, Ron. Phase 2 of the song is already under 
construction...

Best,

dp