[linux-audio-user] Is everyone sick of interrupts yet?
Clemens Ladisch
clemens at ladisch.de
Tue Sep 28 08:27:20 EDT 2004
brad stafford wrote:
> I have a Delta 1010 and I'm running an AMD Barton 2.6 with 5 PCI
> slots. The question is what the heck are IRQ 16 and 22?
IRQ 16 is the 17th interrupt.
IRQ 22 is the 23th interrupt.
> I moved the sound and ethernet cards around to get them to 16 and
> 22 as they used to be eth0 on 21 and ICE1712 on 22.
>
> [brad at mars brad]$ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> ...
> 16: 0 IO-APIC-level ICE1712
> 22: 21 IO-APIC-level eth0
Why? What's the problem?
> Is 16 like the equivalent of IRQ 3 since it's following 15?
No, it would be correct to say that IRQ 16 is IRQ 16. ;-)
The days of XT-compatible interrupt controllers with no more than 16
interrupts are fortunately past. The interrupts above 15 are used for
PCI devices.
> I did turn off USB support in the BIOS.
USB interrupts usually don't cause noticeable latencies.
HTH
Clemens
More information about the Linux-audio-user
mailing list