OT: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Re: OTT

Lee Revell rlrevell at joe-job.com
Fri Apr 1 14:09:21 EST 2005


On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 20:32 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>   \|/
>   -0-
>   /|\
> 
> Here are some more:
> 
> On Friday 01 April 2005 12:58, tim hall wrote:
> > Last Friday 01 April 2005 02:01, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen was like:
> > > Q: How many linux audio users does it take to change a light bulb?
> 
> Two users argue whether gtk/gnome- or qt/kde-lightbulbs look better, 
> accompanied by two or three developers argueing which of the systems is 
> better/easier/cleaner for programming and maintaining a lightbulb.
> Two more developers chip in here wether C++ is better than C or not for 
> bringing a bulb to function. After the fifth "OT" in the subject, one of the 
> old ones complains about missing the one and only language for lightbulbs: 
> Assambler.

One to explain that despite what the box says we don't support 24/96 yet
with that particular light bulb.

Lee




More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list