[linux-audio-user] So, no dice on the PAM RLimits patch?

[Lee Revell]

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 22:46 -0700, thewade wrote:
> 2. Now that I have a running RT kernel and a patched for rlimits pam 
> with all users having "realtime" permissions; how should I start jackd 
> and pd to take advantage of these changes?
> I run:
> nice -5 qjackctl (starting jackd with a priority of 89 as that seems to 
> be as high a priority as qjackctl will let me pass)
> nice -5 pd

That's wrong, don't use nice or qjackctl or PD.  Just run it the normal
way.

> But my latency values are about the same as running:
> qjackctl (and jackd at 0 priority)
> pd

What latency values?  Do you mean you get xruns?  How long?

Lee