[linux-audio-user] LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
Dana Olson
dana at ubuntustudio.com
Mon Apr 17 20:23:18 EDT 2006
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 19:44 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:33 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Lee,
> > Is that what is specifically required or do we need PAM updated AND
> > some new ebuild for set_rlimits?
>
> One or the other - doing both would be pointless.
>
> Actually if your distros glibc is also old then you may need to patch
> PAM rather than upgrade it.
Someone linked to a page for Breezy earlier from my wiki, which IIRC
also used PAM 0.78 (it's been a while). That patch there should be
trivial to apply to Gentoo's PAM. And that's all that would be required.
> Basically set_rtlimits should be considered a stopgap measure to make
> non-root SCHED_FIFO work until your distro gets it together and updates
> their PAM and glibc ;-)
Or for users of Slackware or other such non-PAM-using distros. :)
> See why I recommend just upgrading to a distro with a quicker release
> cycle?
Yup. Dapper is just a month and a half away from proper release. ;)
> Lee
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20060417/1667ffac/attachment.pgp
More information about the Linux-audio-user
mailing list