[linux-audio-user] Re: FC5 + X86_64 + RT16 = no boot

[Mark Knecht]

Sorry. I actually haven't received any requests from people for this
since my offer. I'll box it up and get it in the mail to you in a few
minutes.

If anyone else specifically wants my .config file for a 2.6.15-rt
kernel let me know odd list please.

Cheers,
Mark

On 4/17/06, Loki Davison <loki.davison at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/16/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell at joe-job.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 09:24 +0000, carmen wrote:
> > > > nope, but ive never gotten the RT series to work without either
> > > > freezing/instant-rebooting right after grub passes off execution to
> > > > the kernel, or a kernel panic on some ACPI or similar issue during
> > > > bootup, or a random unprovoked hard freeze within about 5 to 15
> > > > minutse after booting up. this is on several different machines, a
> > > > Sempron64, a Turion64, and an Athlon64, on VIA, MSI, and Shuttle
> > > > platforms. somehow Mark Knecht i think has claimed stable operation on
> > > > this architecture, so maybe you want to ask him his magical
> > > > combination of hardware / compiler / kernel / patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > PLEASE, report these issues to Ingo and LKML!  Bugs do not fix
> > > themselves...
> > >
> > > Lee
> >
> > Hi,
> >    Sorry. I didn't read this thread due to the title but when my nam
> > pops up I figure I'd better find out what people are saying about me.
> >
> >    I'm writing back on my AMD_64 here. It's certainly stable and
> > doesn't crash. I can forward a 2.6.15-rt18 .config file to someone.
> > (Carmen? email address please. Florian? Drop me a note if you want a
> > copy.)
> >
> >    One note: Based on a comment Lee Revel made a few days ago, I think
> > on this list, about the standard kernel giving good realtime results I
> > built 2.6.16-gentoo-r2 on Saturday. It's now up two days with no
> > problems. I'm running at 128/2, and even 64/2 as shown below) in Jack
> > with no xruns so far although I've got a cold and am using it very
> > lightly right now. Anyway, I agree with Lee (so far!) that even the
> > current 2.6.16 series is giving much better performance than older
> > kernels even without Ingo's patches. IF it matters I use the
> > realtime-lsm module and not the othe PAM based stuff.
> >
>
> Can you send it my way too? I'm having a few issues getting newer
> kernels with ingo's patches to boot here. I'm running 2.6.12 now.
>
> Loki
>