[linux-audio-user] Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Frieder Bürzele]

Rossen Apostolov wrote:
> Thomas Kuther wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:41:24 -0500
>> "Reuben Martin" <reuben.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On 4/17/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>>>> Can you file a Gentoo bug report asking them to fully support
>>>>>> the RTPRIO rlimit?
>>>>>>             
>>>> <SNIP>
>>>>         
>>>>> First step is for me to research the Gentoo bugzilla and see what
>>>>> I can find. I'll get back to you with that.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Seems that there has been a report for 8 months with no action
>>>> taken:
>>>>         
>>> Yeah, I'm the one who filed it. I don't know why they are dragging
>>> their feet to use the newer versions. I suspect that it presents
>>> incompatibilities with other programs somewhere that they are waiting
>>> to be fixed.
>>>
>>>       
>>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
>>>>
>>>> I guess the issue doesn't seem important enough to them yet, or this
>>>> description hasn't made it clear enough.
>>>>
>>>> - Mark
>>>>
>>>>         
>> There is an overlay that provides gentoo standard PAM + the patch for
>> RLIMITS usability (beside a lot of nice software not in portage ;)). 
>>
>> svn co svn://svn.tuxfamily.org/svnroot/ckpp/proaudio
>>
>> Might take ages till they include it into main portage, unfortunately. 
>> Gentoo provides realtime-lsm so far, i guess they think that's enough
>> and easier anyway.
>>
>> HTH
>> tom
>>
>>     
> this overlay is great!
>
> but see what i get:
>
>  $ eix -e lash
> * media-libs/lash [3]
>      Available versions:  0.5.0 0.5.1
>      Installed:           none
>      Homepage:            http://www.nongnu.org/lash
>      Description:         LASH Audio Session Handlern
>
> * media-sound/lash
>      Available versions:  0.5.1
>      Installed:           0.5.1
>      Homepage:            http://www.nongnu.org/lash/
>      Description:         LASH Audio Session Handler
>
> [1] /usr/overlays/mine
> [2] /usr/overlays/chutz
> [3] /usr/overlays/proaudio
>
> why is lash put in media-libs when it's in media-sound in gentoo.org?
>
> Rossen
>   
This is because ladcca is in media-libs and lash is the successor so I 
placed it in the same directory. Recently lash hit portage and the 
maintainer put it into the "wrong category".
I'll ask him why he added it to media-sound.

Frieder