[linux-audio-user] Re: Free Software vs. Open Source: Where do*you* stand?

[Cesare Marilungo]

tim hall wrote:

> Yes, but you can't release those pieces under cc licenses unless you 
> have control of copyright. You lose copyright then you lose the right 
> to license those pieces altogether. Being an amateur is a middle-class 
> luxury.

To me, being an amateur is to make art for the sake of art. and being a 
pro its just a job.

If you're right, for similar reasons, maybe also coding software and 
releasing it as open source should be a middle-class luxury. Is this the 
case? I don't think so.

And anyway, how does this thread about copyright and open source relate 
to being an amateur?

c.
-- 
www.cesaremarilungo.com