[LAU] Foul Language

[Chuckk Hubbard]

On 4/10/07, Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas at gmx.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:52 +0100, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:36 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > > > Is it really necessary? Can we say the same thing in a nicer manner?
> > > > Maybe a hundred posts one after another: That must suck, et al. I think
> > > > folks of our intelligence and talent can do better.
> > >
> > > Since when is "suck" classed as "foul language"?
> >
> > Heh, no kidding... this thread is just hilarious.  All this over
> > "sucks"!
> >
> > Wow, guys.  Just.... wow.
> >
> > -DR-
> >
> >
> > P.S. This thread sucks
>
> It reminds me of my highschool year in the U.S. When parents and children were
> together no one used any "foul language", but when each of them were on their
> own, all you would hear was "fuck", "shit", "damn", and "suck", regularly
> used in normal conversation (though i have to admit that the kids used them a
> little more often than the parents).
>
> I often had to laugh about this :) It seemed so silly to me.

My friends loved coming over to my place because my mom swore and
belched and let them too.  You're right, it is silly.

-Chuckk

"Ever tell your kids you're glad that they can think?
Ever say you love them, ever let them watch you drink?"
-Frank Zappa

-- 
http://www.badmuthahubbard.com