[linux-audio-user] Aldrin 0.9 and llvm

Thomas Kuther gimpel at sonnenkinder.org
Mon Jan 22 10:16:31 EST 2007


On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:26 +0100
Leonard Ritter <contact at leonard-ritter.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> > I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi or anything is
> > pretty pointless, right?
> 
> actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the
> wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have
> them at all.
> 
> lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree. perhaps i
> can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have...
> 
> if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i can
> perhaps explain a little.
> 

Yes, I (and maybe others) would be interested. I never heard of it
before and am just starting to see what it is good for.

Currently all i know about it is that it tends to cause massive
headaches for packagers and others trying to compile it :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20070122/a3f6c4c9/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list