[LAU] newbie to Linux audio

[Lars Luthman]

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:56 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> On 18 July 2007 at 7:35, Fons Adriaensen <fons at kokkinizita.net> wrote:
> 
> > Same here. I normally use 24 bit 48 kHz, but 96 works fine as well.
> > Recording straight into Ardour.
> 
> So, what's the advantage of 48kHz over 44.1kHz?  Does that advantage 
> outweigh whatever distortion is introduced from the sample rate 
> conversion going to 44.1kHz, in the event that the recording is 
> destined for a CD?  I'm not partial to either rate, just curious 
> about the advantages & disadvantages.

Is there really any audible distortion if you resample offline using a
sinc resampler with a very large window?


--ll
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20070718/0b03988b/attachment.pgp