[LAU] Proposal: OpenDAWS (long)
d_baron at 012.net.il
Wed Jun 6 12:47:52 EDT 2007
Yes, an open, simple to do and understand format for DAWS. Video might come in
some time in the future.
What I am interested in could be made by simplest application in an editor.
Byte-boundaries in audio files (that's how Cakewalk does it) would require
software, at least to show the boundaries for entry. MIDI files could be
accessed by track and times rather than raw or hex data. Also there are MIDI
assembly languages around.
What I have in mind is not overly ambitious, not an attempt to solve the
world's advanced authoring needs in a huge expensive and propietary manner.
I would still like to see the spec, DTD or some outline of the schema. But I
am interested in opensource!
> It seems a bit sad that any Linux advocate should be backing this
> operation, it would cost about $1500 per year to get access to any kind of
> support for the SDK or advice on best practices and cosiderably more if you
> really want to participate. You could stump up $175 per year yourself to
> propose changes as long as you can find somebody paying the full price or
> more to back you. It is a commercial directive not an open movement. From a
> perspective of Linux audio it is already a pain that the Midi Manufacturers
> Association want cash for their specifications.
> So is the argument for this specification will be 'the professional
> applications will be using it' hence it becomes the standard?
> The whole specification is delivered outside of a GPL, products using its
> specifications are expected to pay royalty licensing and as such should not
> be advocated as a part of any open source movement.
> The proposal here was for an open format, not a closed consortium format,
> the difference may be subtle and is apparantly lost on some people.
> >From: Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
> >Reply-To: paul at linuxaudiosystems.com,A list for linux audio users
> ><linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org>
> >To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org>
> >Subject: Re: [LAU] Proposal: OpenDAWS (long)
> >Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:31:48 -0400
> >On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 18:16 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > > Wonderfully, the linux audio opensource field has become nicely
> > > Opensource means freedom of choice. One is not tied to that $400
> > > bloated DAW program. Comes jack and one can dissect the functionality
> > > network smaller pieces (if one's system can handle the multiple
> > > Trememdous freedom of choice.
> > >
> > > Problem is: No DAW program, opensource or otherwize, interoperates with
> > > other. Cakewalk works with Cakewalk, Cubase with Cubase, Ardour with
> > > etc. Each has its strengths and each has its adherents. Never the
> > > 'twain
> > > meet. (Lash is fine but the restriction remains.)
> > >
> > > Proposal: OpenDAWS.
> >its actual name is AAF-XML. please google it.
> >Linux-audio-user mailing list
> >Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
More information about the Linux-audio-user