[LAU] Looking for a mixer, 16+ channels

Pieter Palmers pieterp at joow.be
Tue Jul 15 11:50:06 EDT 2008


hollunder at gmx.at wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:10:40 +0200
> Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de> wrote:
> 
>> Am Montag, 14. Juli 2008 schrieb hollunder at gmx.at:
>>> By whole band I mean a rather 'traditional' band setup with like,
>>> drums, bass, singer/s, 1-2 guitars, maybe keys.
>>> I would guess that 16 channels is plenty for that, except maybe
>>> when one wants to mic every single drum separately.
>>> His estimation was 16 channels minimum, it doesn't hurt if it's
>>> more.
>> You should go for 24+ channels. A whole drumset is at least 8
>> channels, if the keyboarder isn't recording the midi, there will be
>> additional 2-6 channels for keys. And recording the electric guitars
>> clean and through amp/effects doesn't hurt either. For acoustic
>> guitars it is good to use at least two mics at different distances
>> (provided that they play in their own acoustic booth, otherwise you
>> are pretty much fixed on the plugin-signal). And then you said
>> something about singers...
>>
>> The good thing about such a setup (for example with an rme-pci-card
>> and three adat-interfaces, or several ffado-supported firewire
>> interfaces) is that you get about the same number of outputs. So you
>> can create a lot monitor-mixes for the musicians headphones.
>>
>> Have fun,
>>
>> Arnold
> 
> Thanks Arnold,
> I think it depends a lot on the recording technique, but I guess having
> a few spare channels doesn't hurt.
> Thanks for the hint with multiple firewire devices, that could be a
> solution. If I remember correctly they should have the same timing
> 'automagically'?

That CAN be the case, but is not necessarily so.

Check with the vendors first. If they support it in windows, you can do 
it with FFADO too.

Greets,

Pieter



More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list