[LAU] Qtractor vs Rosegarden

[Danni Coy]

>
> major qtractor cons;)
>
> - no tempo/key-signature map
> - no score/notation editor
> - no automation
> - no plugin latency/delay compensation
>

Does Rosegarden have Automation yet?
or are you listing general cons

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc at rncbc.org> wrote:

> Matthew Smith wrote:
> > Quoth James Cameron at 2008-11-12 18:58...
> >
> >> Quick summary of the difference ... Rosegarden has notation editing,
> >> score production, a matrix editor, a percussion matrix editor, a MIDI
> >> event editor, segments that can be triggered by others.  Qtractor lacks
> >> these, or I could not find them.  Do you need them?  It depends on how
> >> important they are to your workflow.
> > None of these are really too important, although the matrix editing
> > would be handy.  But I can overcome that by using Hydrogen - I have no
> > issues with using more than one bit of software at a time.  After all, I
> > used to do this with LOTS of hardware.
> >
>
> if by matrix editor is what someone else names a piano-roll editor, then
> qtractor also has it: it's called "midi clip editor" there :)
>
> byee
> --
> rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
> rncbc at rncbc.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20081112/a7a116ad/attachment.htm