[LAU] RT patch not needed for new kernels (?)
porl42 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 27 07:18:51 EST 2008
thanks, i'll check it out when i get a chance :)
2008/11/27 hermann meyer <brummer- at web.de>:
> there is a patch for 2.6.27 avaluable here:
> I dont have test them for now I stay with 18.104.22.168-rt7
> regards hermann
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.11.2008, 16:56 +1100 schrieb porl sheean:
>> i haven't had any real problems with 2.6.26 RT patches, but i don't
>> use my midi gear in linux (waiting for ardour 3 branch to mature a bit
>> more first). is there any reason the 2.6.26 patch hasn't been ported
>> forward to 2.6.27? are the changes that prominent that the patch is
>> too difficult to port? i remember the last few releases (24, 25 and
>> 26) didn't take too long before a (albeit preliminary) patch was
>> available, but i have found nothing at all for 27. i'd like to update
>> this machine to intrepid but i want to make sure i'm not going
>> backwards in terms of rt support (i know i can use the older kernel
>> i'm using now, but it kinda defeats the purpose of upgrading then). i
>> noticed there is a 2.6.27-rt package in intrepid actually, what is
>> this if the rt patches aren't available yet?
>> sorry to ramble
>> 2008/11/27 <torbenh at gmx.de>:
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 03:45:45PM -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>> >> In both cases you will need a working Jack and you will need to run it
>> >> with realtime priority (which has nothing to do with the realtime
>> >> preemption patches).
>> > the rumor i am concerned about, is, that you need an RT kernel to run
>> > jackd.
>> > can people stop saying this please ?
>> > --
>> > torben Hohn
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> > Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
>> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
i am kurious oranj!
More information about the Linux-audio-user