[LAU] quicktoots logo

Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammostola at gmail.com
Fri Oct 31 06:56:03 EDT 2008


Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>> Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>  
>>> Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>>      
>>>> Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>>>            
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a 
>>>>> new animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new 
>>>>> one right now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                     
>>>> One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give 
>>>> someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could 
>>>> be taken further.
>>>>
>>>> http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             
>>> I have received a new set of logos with a different angle from the 
>>> previous one which is very apt. I have put them online for 
>>> discussion and maybe they will inspire someone else to have a go too.
>>>
>>> http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
>>>
>>> *Ideally I would like to have an animated logo that fits into the 
>>> header space so please keep it  in mind while designing. Of course 
>>> if you don't feel up to doing the animation but still have a good 
>>> idea for the static image that is not a problem as we can always 
>>> animate it later.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> The new one is much better IMHO. Maybe the teacher should have some 
>> music notes and linux commands on his white board?
>>
>>   
> This can be arranged.
>
>
>> To be honest. Those animated logo's don't do any good. Very 
>> irritating and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
>>
>>   
> I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna 
> be animated.
>
That would be a bad thing IMHO.

To be honest, the frontpage of the quicktoots almoste even  bad ad the 
most brutal advertisement website with all those thing flashing in your 
face (...exaggeration...) .

Ok, your content is far from 'brutal' ;), but it is the same when its 
comes to irritating flash/ animated/ moving things. Anyone specialist 
would say this is a bad thing to do on a website, unless you want to 
earn quick money and put some animated nude woman in your website... :/

I like the idea of the website! :) , but when it comes to the logo, I 
only see disadvantages of (to much) animated stuff there.

Regards,







More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list