[LAU] licensing fun, was Re: Yamaha Disklavier Pro grand piano

Randy Kramer rhkramer at gmail.com
Thu Sep 18 12:26:01 EDT 2008


On Thursday 18 September 2008 11:27 am, drew Roberts wrote:
> So, are there any Free programs built around QT that are not GPL? 

I can't answer that definatively.  I know KDE is (being?) ported to 
Windows, but I guess they manage to do that as free software (i.e., 
under the GPL license of Qt).  It seems to me I've heard of some 
commercial programs using (or planning to use) Qt, but I can't recite 
any names.

> To do this  
> legally, one would have to purchase a commercial license right? And 
then all 
> contributors would also need commercial licenses right? The mind 
boggles.

Yup, and, iirc, the original terms of Qt's dual license required that 
you make a decision up front--if you were going to develop a commercial 
application under the commercial (not GPL) license, you had to decide 
when you started developing your application, and from that point, pay 
for Qt.  (If that was not for Qt, it was for some other dual licensed  
library.)

Randy Kramer
-- 
I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video 
instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al.



More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list