[LAU] Value of low-latency in audio?

[Dave Phillips]

Scott Ecker wrote:
> david wrote:
>   
>> ...
>>
>> I see people on the list running much lower latencies than 64msec, and 
>> seemingly trying to get even lower ...
>>     
>
> You can't punch-in at 64ms and expect it to sound good.  At 4ms it's
> seamless, literally.
>
>   
Indeed. I think the ll issue is of real importance when recording. At 64 
ms multitrack recording/playback is a not very satisfying experience.

Best,

dp