[LAU] [ANN] MusE 1.0

[david]

Brent Busby wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, sonofzev at iinet.net.au wrote:
> 
>> TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about jackmidi and 
>> other features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From 
>> my understanding QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't 
>> necessarily bring more sequencer functionality in. (correct me if I'm 
>> wrong) However migrating could require a major overhaul....
>>
>> Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or 
>> so and MusE is functioning really really well.  It may look a bit 
>> dated.. but that's really not the point is it?
> 
> Actually, I'm kind of dreading KDE/QT 4, because nothing I've seen or 
> heard of it has impressed me.  As for looking dated, these days, usually 
> that seems to be defined by most people as not looking like a recent 
> version of Windows, which also isn't something I really aspire to with 
> my desktop anyway.
> 
> I think I'd agree with everything you've said -- if MusE (or any app) 
> decided to stay on QT3 for longer, it wouldn't break my heart at all!

A friend of mine who is busy trying to push me into using KDE4 says "It 
has more eye candy than Windows!" as if that is something wonderful!

I also understand that Qt4 is supposed to be completely cross-platform 
now, so KDE will be able to run KDE4 on Windows.

-- 
David
gnome at hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community