[LAU] Linux audio app design: The nature of xruns

Atte André Jensen atte.jensen at gmail.com
Wed Dec 30 03:15:23 EST 2009


Guido Scholz wrote:
> Am Mon, 28. Dec 2009 um 15:24:02 -0500 schrieb lanas:
> 
>> Le Lundi, 28 Décembre 2009 20:17:21 +0100,
>> Guido Scholz <guido.scholz at bayernline.de> a écrit :
> 
> Hi "lanas",
> could you please reply to the list an not to my private e-mail?

I use thunderbird, and I have two reply-buttons, which works like this 
with messages on lau:

"Reply" will send a reply to the author only.

"Reply All" will send a reply to the author + cc other authors + cc the 
lau list.

About half the FLOSS lists I'm on (abcusers, blue-music, chuck, csound, 
livecode, supercollider) will send a reply to the list when pressing 
"Reply". The other half (ardour, ffado, lau, lilypond, mscore, pd, zyn) 
work like lau, replying to author when pressing "Reply".

I asked before, and there doesn't seem be anything to do about it in my 
thunderbird setup). So someone (here, I think) suggested that I just 
made a habit of using "Reply all" on all lists.

I even got heavy flaming once for cc'ing a reply to the lau list. The 
poster had *intentionally* *only* replied to me, and my message filter 
placed the message in the lau folder, due to [LAU] in the subject. When 
I hit "Reply" or "Reply All" I noticed that I was only writing to the 
author, and hence figured I accidentally must have hit "Reply", and thus 
manually added cc:lau.

Bottom line: I know that you two are heated, but if I cannot press 
"Reply All" without prospect of getting corrected, I would really and 
sincerely like to know that I should do? Please don't flame me, I would 
actually like to know!

-- 
Atte

http://atte.dk   http://modlys.dk



More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list