[LAU] 64studio, FFADO, no luck

[Arnold Krille]

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 22:21:44 Anders Dahnielson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:41, Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 21:06:29 Anders Dahnielson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 20:39, Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de>
> > wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:30:53 Ken Restivo wrote:
> > > > > OK well that throws a monkey wrench into my plan to convert the
> > studio
> > > > from
> > > > > Mac/ProTools to Linux/Ardour. Damn.
> > > > Maybe you can start by convincing them about Mac/Ardour?
> > > > I don't really understand why mac-users (especially if they paid
> > premium
> > > > money
> > > > for hardware) should switch to Linux where half their hardware isn't
> > > > supported... Shouldn't ardour (through jackd/portaudio) play
> > > > perfectly one the
> > > > digi-stuff?
> > > Yes. but I think you answered the question yourself in the last
> > > sentence.
> > I did? I didn't say "Make them buy overpriced proprietary stuff to use it
> > with
> > free software", I said "If they already happen to have the bad
> > proprietary stuff, why try to convince them off the full free ensemble
> > where they have to
> > spend more money on new hardware if they could just do a smooth
> > transition by
> > switching one component at a time?" Applies both for Mac/ProTool and
> > Mac/Motu...
> > Or is the digi-stuff not usable with apples' portaudio?
> Oh, I think I missread. Sorry.

I probably mixed up portaudio and coreaudio to confuse you further...
Why are they all named *audio??? :-)

Have fun,

Arnold

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20090218/93444300/attachment.pgp