[LAU] ubuntu realtime

[Raffaele Morelli]

2009/6/2 Simon Wise <simonzwise at gmail.com>

> Dave Phillips wrote:
> >
> > I say again: I like Ubuntu, I think it's a neat system with a great
> > desktop. It just also sucks in some areas that critically matter to me.
>
> Yes, I agree here ..
>
> Perhaps many distributions are working hard to look after a subset of
> users who's main concerns are quite valid - they want a system that
> 'just works' when used for their tasks. It is 'a good thing' IMHO if
> some distributions are successful in this, if some distributions 'just
> work' for typical office tasks, others 'just work' for typical home
> tasks [there is a lot of overlap here] then the number of individuals
> and companies using linux will increase, the demand for hardware
> manufactures to support linux will increase, maybe more computers will
> be available retail with linux pre-installed - all this helps increase
> the number of developers working on linux as a system, and the number of
> people who grow up with linux as their default system because it is in
> their school, or at home, when they first start using a computer.
>
> I am unlikely to use such a distribution - it is not put together to
> cater for my needs. As a specialist user of linux with specialist needs
> I expect to have to deal with the system on a much more basic level, I
> need to use a distribution that is much more basic and allows manual
> configuration, maybe if I am lucky I may find a specialist distribution
> that is adapted and pre-configured by people with the same needs. It is
> slower initially, but eventually much more efficient, to do
> configurations from scratch rather than trying to un-configure a tightly
> put together system that is not suited to my needs.
>
> The most long-established user base for linux is in the server world -
> hence the very strict definition of what is 'stable' in distribution
> systems such as Debian, which for my purposes tends to equate with 'out
> of date'. Most of the time I don't need my machines to be as reliable or
> secure as a webserver or database server needs to be, I've found
> 'unstable' more to my needs. Luckily I am not alone - currently I'm
> using Sidux [the Xfce version] as the starting point for my systems, but
> there are lots of choices out there.
>
> IMHO asking a distribution to be more flexible at the cost of being
> puzzing to the novice is a bit unfair if the principle aims of that
> distribution are to give an unambitious user a complete 'it just works'
> solution to their most common needs.
>
> It is easy to have a machine dual-bootable and use one distribution for
> home/office use and another for specialist purposes if required.
>
>
> Simon


As someone said, Ubuntu is debian sid/unstable with lipstick.

Now, I can't really figure out how can Ubuntu Studio be such a bad distro
for multimedia productions but I can surely say that debian testing/squeeze
with a 2.6.29.4-rt works great and so did with the previous kernel releases
(after the midi issues in 2.6.26 kernels have been fixed).

IMHO users should be allowed to install rt kernels or driver for new
hardware from unofficial repos instead of being forced to use multimedia
distros in order to reach low latencies, more users more testing more
problems being fixed.
Tracking 5, 6, 7 distro in somewhat "scrappy".

One of the thing I would really like to know is the "diff" between those
multimedia distros, apart from package versions.

cheers
-r
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20090602/6e110f85/attachment.htm