[LAU] yoshimi bug - fixed by me !

[cal]

david wrote:
> cal wrote:
>> david wrote:
>>> [ ... ]
>>> I am running the jackd that my distro provides - 0.109.2.
>>>
>>> No why distros don't include a newer version eludes me ...
>> Indeed. You're not the first and won't be the last to ask that. Last time
>> this came up in the context of yoshimi, Josh Lawrence had a fairly elegant solution.
>> <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2009-September/063063.html>
> 
> OK, tracked down the 64studio backports, and checked. It has JACK 
> 1.9.2-0.64studio2~lenny1. That doesn't sound like 0.116.etc ...
ah, but it is in fact very much like 0.116 etc, see <http://www.jackaudio.org/node/24>  
>> That thread also featured a strong comment:
>>   jackaudio.org notes that "nobody should be using 0.109 at this point in time".
>>
>> This is the modern age after all.
> 
> This makes me ask the question, "What are the JACK developers NOT doing 
> that is keeping their recommendation from replacing .109 with .116 in 
> repositories, then?" Other programs got it done somehow ...
That's so far off the mark I really have to leave it alone.