[LAU] open hw soundcard

Karl Hammar karl at aspodata.se
Mon Nov 16 04:56:17 EST 2009


Martin Peach:
> >> karl at aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) wrote:
...
> >>> If we are going to have multiple analog inputs at higt sample rate,
> >>> isn't it better to have a parallell interface. With spi the number of
> >>> channels will be limited to something like 8 for a 24bit converter.
> >>> Plus that the AT32AP7000/AT91SAM9260 only has two spi-busses.
...
> Another way to do that would be to bit-bang 8 SPI devices sharing one 
> clock line (and /CS/FS) onto a byte-wide port, read all 8 in parallel 
> one bit at a time in perfect sync.
> 
> It actually should be possible to use a /RD line for an SPI clock, so 24 
> successive reads of a single address would clock in 8 24-bit samples.

I tend to dislike bitbanging, but yes, that should be doable, something
like:

void read_all_adcs() {
  uint32_t adc[32];  // up to 32 adc converters
  int ix;
  int kx;
  uint32_t bits;

  chip_select(0);
  // the first few bits are to start converter
  bits = get_data();    
  bits = get_data();    
  bits = get_data();    
  bits = get_data();    
  bits = get_data();    
  for (ix = 0; ix < 24; ix++) {
    bits = get_data();    
    for (kx = 0; kx < 32; kx++) {
      adc[kx] <<= 1;
      adc[kx] |= bits & 1;
      bits >>= 1;
    }
  }
  chip_select(1);
}

I have to think about that. The big "but" would be that the clock
(the frequency of get_data()) should be stable, I don't know how much
variation is allowed.

Regards,
/Karl

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Karl Hammar                    Aspö Data               karl at aspodata.se
Lilla Aspö 148                                                 Networks
S-742 94 Östhammar          +46  173 140 57                   Computers
Sweden                     +46  70 511 97 84                 Consulting
-----------------------------------------------------------------------





More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list