[LAU] modular audio apps and control-communication was: off topic

Patrick Shirkey pshirkey at boosthardware.com
Wed Sep 2 20:20:34 EDT 2009


On 09/03/2009 04:06 AM, sh0099 wrote:
> i know OSC
> but there is no communication standard for control data like jack for audio
> and i think without this you can not modularise fully.
>
> i am not a pop musican
> i use mostly supercollider, ardour and faust.
> everything i want to automatise have to be some plugin (faust) or a big
> workaround (osc)
>
> and the atvantage of jack are in the global context small when you read
> this:
>
> "*Betreff: *FORUM WORKSHOPS - November 18-20, 2009 at IRCAM from 10AM to
> 6PM daily
> ...
> Taking advantage of our historic collaboration with Cycling74 for
> Max/MSP on the one hand and our récent collaboration with the German
> company Ableton, Forum members will be able to get to know Ableton’s
> *Live 8* as well as the new possibility of including Max/MSP patches
> directly in *Live 8* thanks to *Max for Live*."
>
>
> these blockheads seam to have also there (private) jack...
>
>
>    



That would be kind of sad if they have chosen not to use JACK to enable 
this integration as there must have been a lot of overlap in the code 
design.

However it also opens up the possibility for someone round here to use 
the same api to enable integration.











Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd






> Gabriel M. Beddingfield schrieb:
>    
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, sh0099 wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> there is one point i am not aware of:
>>> is there a standard in jack or any other
>>> linux-audio-interprocess-comunication for control data? (event based and
>>> continuously)
>>>
>>> or do i have to use midi? (7bit :-( )
>>>        
>> Take a look at OSC.
>>
>> -Gabriel
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>    



More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list