[LAU] need some advice before upgrading JACK

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki eric at zhevny.com
Wed Sep 23 12:43:01 EDT 2009


On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> Hi Dave!
> 
> I have a dual core laptop and using Jack2 has brought an increase in
> performance. I use compiled Jack2 and Jack apps from the packaging system.
> 
> Carlo
> 
> Dave Phillips wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > 64 Studio 2.1 is a wonderfully stable and reliable system, one I've used 
> > profitably for quite a long time now. Alas, it's definitely out-of-date, 
> > and its version of JACK is the lamentable 0.109.2, and it's causing some 
> > problems with AVSynthesis that I'd like to finally resolve by upgrading 
> > JACK.
> > 
> > I have 64 Studio 3.0 beta on my laptop, but I don't plan to upgrade the 
> > production machine until 3.0 reaches a stable public release. Meanwhile 
> > I'll be pleased if I can safely upgrade some of its components.
> > 
> > Here's the question: I've successfully compiled JACK 0.116.2 and JACK2 
> > 1.9.3, so in the opinions of my fellow LAUyers, which is the better 
> > choice for this system ? If I move to JACK2 will I need to recompile my 
> > JACK-savvy apps ? (That's not usually a problem.)

Does anyone know if jack2 is being packaged yet for any .deb distros?

-Eric Rz.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list