[LAU] wikipedia: jack may not meet notability

[Dave Phillips]

Bengt Gördén wrote:
> Wouldn't your articles in LJ about jack constitute a reliable secondary source?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
>   

Hi Bengt,

I'm not sure if these articles meet the criteria, but if anyone's 
interested in adding these URLs to the Wikipedia entry, feel free to do so:

    JACK Sync: A Primer For Linux Users - 
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1004080

    Knowing JACK - 
http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/67/JACK_Audio_Server.pdf

    Computer Music and the Linux Operating System: A Report - 
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/014892603322730488

All are out of date to some degree, but they also contain some 
still-useful information. The CMJ article includes special mention of JACK.

Best,

dp