[LAU] I just don't know Jack anymore.

[Ken Restivo]

On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:47:21AM +0200, Philipp ??berbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from Brent Busby's message of 2010-06-03 12:43:39 +0200:
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, david wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't know all those details. JackDMP 1.9.x works here where I 
> > > couldn't get JACK 0.116 to work. But I've only got lowly single-core 
> > > processors here.
> > 
> > Hmm...  That's mostly what I was wanting to know.  I've heard the 0.x 
> > series is more mature, and I've been using it -- but does that mean the 
> > 1.x series is deprecated?  Is it working for most people?
> 
> Neither is the successor of the other, neither is deprecated. It's two
> implementations developed in parallel.

Wait, what?

Last I was following this, Paul was saying fairly consistently that jackdmp was intended to replace jackd. Newer codebase, better implementation, C++ not C, multi-core, etc etc.

Has that position changed while I wasn't paying attention?

-ken