[LAU] perhaps why some of us have more trouble w/ pulseaudio than others (ICE1712/M-audio delta problem w/ pulseaudio)

[Ng Oon-Ee]

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, david <gnome at hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
> rosea.grammostola wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
>>>
>>> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin at linuxuse.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
>>>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
>>>>> to pro-audio.
>>>>>
>>>>> best regs
>>>>> HZN
>>>>
>>>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
>>>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
>>>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
>>>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
>>>> soundcard.
>>>
>>> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
>>
>> ???
>
> Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town?
> ;-)
>

Yeah, world domination is ALWAYS on the agenda I'm sure. Which is why
Pulseaudio automatically suspends its control of a sound card with
jack2 requests control =)