[LAU] yoshimi + jack session
allcoms at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 19:22:36 UTC 2010
Lovely to hear JACK1 is better than ever but I was told that JACK2
would support SMP better than JACK1. Would better SMP support in J2
lead to more efficient handling and processing wrt plugins ie LADSPA's
or maybe even the ability to squeeze more tracks out of your hardware?
If not, why JACK2?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:06 PM, allcoms <allcoms at gmail.com> wrote:
>> . Please try this combo of apps
>>> with JACK 1 SVN or JACK2 but I personally am more interested in JACK1
>>> as it is reportedly more stable and xrun-packed than JACK2. I haven't
>>> actually done any real testing with JACK2 yet but that was the case
>>> last I asked Torben about this and so I just took his word for it.
>> That should've read 'less xrun-packed' of course.
>> Has anyone done any testing wrt performance and stability of JACK1 vs
>> JACK2 recently? Be nice is Paul or Torben could give us a brief
>> update on this.
> neither torben nor myself use jack2. jack1 is more stable than ever.
> are you expecting something?
More information about the Linux-audio-user