[LAU] usb or firewire (when having a ricoh chipset)
jeremy at autostatic.com
Thu Oct 28 14:57:01 UTC 2010
On 10/28/2010 03:41 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Thursday 28 October 2010 13:10:00 rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> Having a ricoh firewire chipset here on a thinkpad t61. Not the best one
> This depends. There are Ricoh chipsets that work (even better with the quirks
> of current kernels) and there are chipsets that don't work.
>> Should I go for a usb (edirol for example) or firewire interface?
> This also depends:
> Do you want more then stereo-in-stereo-out? If yes, firewire is a sane
> Do you want the ability to connect more then one devices, even if its only at
> a later point? If yes, firewire is the only feasible solution. USB doesn't
> really provide any synchronization or even synchronous data-transfer.
> Which devices share the interrupts? If your firewire chip (built in or via
> pccard) has its own interrupt while the usb ports share their interrupt with
> each other and also with disk/wireless/screen, you will have better luck with
> (One advantage of usb is that it always has 5V which devices can use to run
> and to create phantom power. Firewire in laptops is either 5-pin without +12V
> or needs an extra power-adaptor to provide the +12V to power external devices
> and provide phantom power.)
> Have fun,
And what about this recent discussion on USB soundcards
Or was that specifically about the EHCI implementation?
More information about the Linux-audio-user