[LAU] rt kernel in debian/squeeze

[rosea.grammostola]

On 01/07/2011 10:03 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 09:44 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> On 01/07/2011 09:34 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2011 09:22 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>>>> On 01/07/2011 09:15 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/07/2011 08:56 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/07/2011 08:14 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
>>>>>>> in addition to Robin's suggestions, I'll add one more to the mix:
>>>>>>> AVLinux uses this kernel, I dunno if it is a true -rt kernel, but my
>>>>>>> results have been very positive:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://liquorix.net/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ymmv.  my initial reaction would be to trust the 64 studio kernel
>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>> all of the suggestions, just b/c they are familiar with the linux
>>>>>>> audio landscape.
>>>>>> The liquorix kernel is not a RT kernel. And I tried the 64 Studio
>>>>>> kernel, had to change the apt line though:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports squeeze-backports main contrib
>>>>>> non-free
>>>> Is there also a 64studio RT kernel for Lucid?
>>> No, although there's some minor effort for Maverick.
>>>
>>> Previously we did -rt kernel packages for i386, i686 and amd64.
>>> Currently we're focusing on amd64 and squeeze only. That may change
>>> again in the not-too-distant future once 2.6.37-rt is out.
>>>
>>> Depending on pengutronix' config for 2.6.37-rt we may also just join
>>> Uwe Kleine-König's endeavour.
>> Ok, I'm interested in your view about that kernel.
> It is not released yet and there's no ETA.
>
>> Is it good practice to install a debian kernel for Lucid?
> It should not make a difference. The only thing is you won't get
> automatic updates.
Or it should be a special repo for the kernel... Then updates should be 
possible.

\r