[LAU] [Android|OT?] CamSynth - Just an experiment

[Patrick Shirkey]

On Thu, July 26, 2012 11:30 pm, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM, S. Massy <lists at wolfdream.ca> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think this is necessarily about "young" vs. "mature" thinking; I
>> think this has more to do with being a rational thinker vs. being a
>> dreamer (not an anarchist, necessarily). I believe a society or
>> community needs both in order to evolve in a meaningful direction.
>>
>
> i mostly agree .... but ... its very easy when you're young to find the
> energy to drive changes forward, to come up with (what seem like) new
> ideas. the problem is that its much harder when you're young to be aware
> when your new ideas are actually old ideas that didn't work, or when the
> changes you propose will have subtle side effects that negate the benefits
> you were imagining. by the time you gain this perspective, for the most
> part, the energy has diminished and the apparently new ideas are in short
> supply.
>
> its clearly necessary to inject new energy into the system. the ongoing
> dilemma of any organized society is how to harness the wellsprings of new
> ideas with the wisdom of experience to create (cultural) changes that
> actually improve things over some time scale. its a very hard problem. we
> don't want the irrational exhuberance of the visionary to dominate over
> the
> insight of the rationalist, but we also don't want the cynicism and
> momentum/inertia of the rationalist to inhibit the visionaries.
>
> put differently, its moog versus buchla, but we want urs heckman to win :)


The problem is that we have a select group/monopoly attempting to tell us
what the rules are and forcing them on us at every opportunity. A curious
side process is this same group often break their own rules to maintain
their monopoly over telling us what the rules are.

So that probably means there are no rules and we can just make them up as
we go along to suit our current agenda. In this case I think George Carlin
sums it up best:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-RGN21TSGk

======
George Carlin explains his theory on the creation of the ten commandments.

Here is my problem with the ten commandments- why exactly are there 10?
You simply do not need ten. The list of ten commandments was artificially
and deliberately inflated to get it up to ten. Here's what happened:

About 5,000 years ago a bunch of religious and political hustlers got
together to try to figure out how to control people and keep them in line.
They knew people were basically stupid and would believe anything they
were told, so they announced that God had given them some commandments, up
on a mountain, when no one was around.

Well let me ask you this- when they were making this shit up, why did they
pick 10? Why not 9 or 11? I'll tell you why- because 10 sound official.
Ten sounds important! Ten is the basis for the decimal system, it's a
decade, it's a psychologically satisfying number (the top ten, the ten
most wanted, the ten best dressed). So having ten commandments was really
a marketing decision! It is clearly a bullshit list. It's a political
document artificially inflated to sell better. I will now show you how you
can reduce the number of commandments and come up with a list that's a
little more workable and logical. I am going to use the Roman Catholic
version because those were the ones I was taught as a little boy.

Let's start with the first three:

I AM THE LORD THY GOD THOU SHALT NOT HAVE STRANGE GODS BEFORE ME
THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN
THOU SHALT KEEP HOLY THE SABBATH
Right off the bat the first three are pure bullshit. Sabbath day? Lord's
name? strange gods? Spooky language! Designed to scare and control
primitive people. In no way does superstitious nonsense like this apply to
the lives of intelligent civilized humans in the 21st century. So now
we're down to 7. Next:

HONOR THY FATHER AND MOTHER
Obedience, respect for authority. Just another name for controlling
people. The truth is that obedience and respect shouldn't be automatic.
They should be earned and based on the parent's performance. Some parents
deserve respect, but most of them don't, period. You're down to six.

Now in the interest of logic, something religion is very uncomfortable
with, we're going to jump around the list a little bit.

THOU SHALT NOT STEAL
THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS
Stealing and lying. Well actually, these two both prohibit the same kind
of behavior- dishonesty. So you don't really need two you combine them and
call the commandment "thou shalt not be dishonest". And suddenly you're
down to 5.

And as long as we're combining I have two others that belong together:

THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTRY
THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR'S WIFE
Once again, these two prohibit the same type of behavior. In this case it
is marital infidelity. The difference is- coveting takes place in the
mind. But I don't think you should outlaw fantasizing about someone else's
wife because what is a guy gonna think about when he's waxing his carrot?
But, marital infidelity is a good idea so we're gonna keep this one and
call it "thou shalt not be unfaithful". And suddenly we're down to four.

But when you think about it, honesty and infidelity are really part of the
same overall value so, in truth, you could combine the two honesty
commandments with the two fidelity commandments and give them simpler
language, positive language instead of negative language and call the
whole thing "thou shalt always be honest and faithful" and we're down to
3.

THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR"S GOODS
This one is just plain fuckin' stupid. Coveting your neighbor's goods is
what keeps the economy going! Your neighbor gets a vibrator that plays "o
come o ye faithful", and you want one too! Coveting creates jobs, so leave
it alone. You throw out coveting and you're down to 2 now- the big honesty
and fidelity commandment and the one we haven't talked about yet:

THOU SHALT NOT KILL
Murder. But when you think about it, religion has never really had a big
problem with murder. More people have been killed in the name of god than
for any other reason. All you have to do is look at Northern Ireland,
Cashmire, the Inquisition, the Crusades, and the World Trade Center to see
how seriously the religious folks take thou shalt not kill. The more
devout they are, the more they see murder as being negotiable. It depends
on who's doin the killin' and who's gettin' killed. So, with all of this
in mind, I give you my revised list of the two commandments:

Thou shalt always be honest and faithful to the provider of thy nookie.
&
Thou shalt try real hard not to kill anyone, unless of course they pray to
a different invisible man than you.
Two is all you need; Moses could have carried them down the hill in his
fuckin' pocket. I wouldn't mind those folks in Alabama posting them on the
courthouse wall, as long as they provided one additional commandment:

Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself.
======




--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd