No subject

</blockquote>
yoshimi brought in performance over zynaddsubfx, and I don&#39;t think<br>
there is any reason why you should be using zyn instead of yoshimi.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
One reason I switched to using Yoshimi instead of Zyn was because Zyn would=
 frequently simply hang, unresponsive, when running JACK at what I consider=
ed low latencies (8-16ms). (Other folk on the list probably don&#39;t consi=
der that low latency at all.) Yoshimi didn&#39;t have that problem.<br>




<br>
I THINK Yoshimi uses more CPU than Zyn, never checked to measure.<br>
<br>
The Yoshimi UI is cleaner than Zyn&#39;s, more readable. I think both of th=
em would benefit by realizing that the typical graphics UI now is much high=
er resolution than the cramped little spaces the UI seems to be designed fo=
r, but that&#39;s could be just my opinion.<span><font color=3D"#888888"></=
font></span><br>



</blockquote><div><br>Thanks to all for the quick and informative replies! =
<br><br>Renato, this is exactly what I was looking for! <br>Thanks to David=
 for fixing the bug in Yoshimi through the AUR package (even though it come=
s from upstream).<br>

<br>I will focus on Yoshimi for now... big sunday ahead :-) !<br><br>Blue s=
kies to all,<br>Victor<br><br><br>=C2=A0<br></div></div>

--f46d0418258261f16c04bd28935a--