[LAU] [OT] Debian versions - Was: Re: ardour3 on debian stable

[gnome at hawaii.rr.com]

And I like Debian Sid via Aptosid.

david
gnome at hawaii.rr.com
http://dancingtreefrog.com
authenticity, honesty, community

---- Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsutton at gmail.com> wrote: 
> On 13/12/2013 09:53, Milan Lazecky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > thank you for information - I was hoping crunchbang was from unstable...
> > I have it on my netbook few days and working well.
> > But anyway, unstable debian should be well prepared system and if you
> > don't have "old iron" (as me) and want to do good stuff, using ardour3
> > etc, I would really recommend you to upgrade into unstable. Living on
> > the edge is the only way to see further, I would say.
> 
> IMHO Testing is also a good compromise. But I guess it also depends on 
> personal taste.
> 
> Lorenzo.
> 
> 
> >
> > Milan
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/12 Atte <atte at youmail.dk <mailto:atte at youmail.dk>>
> >
> >     Hi
> >
> >     I'm runing crunchbang linux, which essentially is debian stable. I'm
> >     having trouble getting ardour3 working, tried both the source
> >     tarball, checking out from git and the paid-for download from
> >     ardour.org <http://ardour.org>. Let's take the later: