[LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

[Brendan Jones]

On 02/06/2013 05:19 PM, hermann meyer wrote:
> Am 06.02.2013 16:49, schrieb Al Thompson:
>> I had to laugh at this.  Every once in a while, I will search to see if
>> there are any new LADSPA or LV2 plugins.  I often see plugins described
>> by their mathematical function, with NO hint of what it actually does.
>> If linux audio would like to get its foot in the door with guitarists,
>> defining available plugins only by math function is not the way to go
>> about it.  It almost seems like some plugins exists only because they
>> were someone's class assignment (write a plugin using FFT).
> Usually I wouldn't answer on this topic, even if I have some concerns,
> but I will repeat on this.
> Because my last announcements here on this list was exactly about LV2
> plug-ins for guitarist which indeed use at least FFT.
>> This release introduce the first LV2 plugs created from the guitarix

Whilst being a standalone project (i.e not a DAW/authoring tool) this is 
one linux audio project which seems really committed to 
interoperability. Its a huge effort to develop this way.

A question someone asked a thread or two back, do you suffer from not 
enough feedback from users?