[LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?

[James Stone]

Ooops.. Sorry - just seen this was discussed last month.]

Please ignore the noise!

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Stone <jamesmstone at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any advantages to using 96k (or 48k?) if the final target is
> 44.1k/16bit? I am thinking that tracking at 44.1k / 24 bit should be
> more than sufficient for most (non-pro) purposes?
>
> I read somewhere about higher bitrate being important for headroom for
> audio processing plugins, but does samplerate also have an effect on
> this?
>
> James