[LAU] Linux Audio podcast, episode001

[Louigi Verona]

An interesting discussion in the mailing list was at the end of 2012 when I
wrote this article:
http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_progress

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-October/087434.html

Many people say what they think.




On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Just some thoughts to share <snip>
> Nice perspective, informative. I think it would be a great resource to get
> feedback like what you said from a wide range of linux-audio musicians, as
> a kind of "probe" to find the most significant lacking elements. Perhaps
> I'll be told "we know that already", but what harm in confirming our
> suspicions?
> Anybody know how to best gather up such info? (I'm not experienced in that
> kinda thing)
>
> Re workflow, if some type of OSC protocol could be established between a
> synth ("client"/"automate-able") and an automation program
> ("host"/"automater"), twisting the knob on the synth client could inform
> the host which parameter to show in the editor...?
> Perhaps its a bit of a hack, and it would require wide-spread
> implementation to become useful, but it is a *workable* solution. Perhaps
> not the neatest, but I think worth mentioning.
>
>
>


-- 
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20130702/3aaf1365/attachment.html>