[LAU] [OT] photo processing (was Distro upgrade vs: new install)
david
gnome at hawaii.rr.com
Sat Jun 1 17:53:30 UTC 2013
On 05/31/2013 11:30 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2013/5/31 Jouni Rinne <l33tmmx at gmail.com <mailto:l33tmmx at gmail.com>>
>
> 31.05.2013 22:04, david kirjoitti:
> > On 05/31/2013 02:15 AM, Ivan Tarozzi wrote:
> >> Il 31/05/2013 14:12, Jörn Nettingsmeier ha scritto:
> >>> On 05/31/2013 12:16 PM, david wrote:
> >>>
> >>> check out darktable.org <http://darktable.org> and never look
> back :-D
> >>
> >> +1 ;)
> >
> > I tried out Darktable. I couldn't make heads or tails of it. For
> instance, never
> > figured out how to get it to actually output a processed image.
> >
> > So I dropped it and went with RawTherapee instead. :-)
> >
> > But neither of them have the speed of the proprietary program,
> neither support
> > using multiple cores, neither have the photo management chops.
> (Well, near as I
> > can tell about Darktable.)
> >
> Unfortunately, I have to agree. Darktable has the most un-intuitive and
> confusing interface I've seen in any program. A shame.
>
> I remember I was confused at first, but I learned quickly by watching
> some screencasts:
> http://www.darktable.org/resources/#screencasts
>
> I think that the UI of Darktable is great, especially the last version
> (view of modules is improved, for example)
Thanks, but I think that if *someone must show you how to use a program*
when you're already familiar with the knowledge domain (photo
processing), it's not an intuitive UI.
--
David
gnome at hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
http://clanjones.org/david/
http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
More information about the Linux-audio-user
mailing list