[LAU] OT: Terrible open source definition

Philipp Überbacher murks at tuxfamily.org
Wed Sep 11 13:16:02 UTC 2013

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:22:56 +0100
Andrew C <countfuzzball at gmail.com> wrote:

> Entirely OT, but I had a lecture at Uni yesterday and the first slide
> was talking about Eclipse and how it's 'open source, so it means it's
> free to use for both commercial and non-commercial purposes'.
> Needless to say, I cringed at the "definition".
> We now return you to your regularly scheduled linux audio
> related discussions.

I hope you gave your lecturer and the audience a proper lecture.


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list