[LAU] Bitwig: what we can learn from it

rosea grammostola rosea.grammostola at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 16:36:24 UTC 2014


>> I think what we learned in this thread is that the expectations of
>> many [potential] linux audio users does not match the idea that many
>> developers have in mind.

That's not the whole story. Some developers have other goals then users of
that project, ok. Users can complain or request features, which devs
decline or ignore.


But it's more often the case that a software project offers you a feature
and it turns out that it doesn't work in itself or not in the ecosystem of
linuxaudio. That ecosystem is often the problem, e.g. plugin not working in
a certain host, or in modular environment, one bad behaving client is
killing the chain.
We could try to make this part better.


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Robin Gareus <robin at gareus.org> wrote:

> On 04/02/2014 05:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:50:29 +0200
> > Robin Gareus <robin at gareus.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway back on subject.
> >>
> >> I think what we learned in this thread is that the expectations of
> >> many [potential] linux audio users does not match the idea that many
> >> developers have in mind.
> >>
> >
> > Also, we learn some people think their snobbish opinions about music
> > matter.
> >
>
> We might be able to do something about the former, the latter is much
> harder.
>
> best,
> robin
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20140402/5c80e94d/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list