[LAU] progressive time stretch

Edgar Aichinger edogawa at aon.at
Sat Feb 15 09:03:07 UTC 2014


Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 23:57:04 schrieb Renato:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:29 +0100
> raf <rmouneyres at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'd recommend to create a tempo map (vs timestreching which would
> > lead to artefacts) As you mention recording in ardour, you could use
> > it to create the tempo map,
> 
> hi, what is a "tempo map" and how do you create it in ardour? couldn't
> find anything about it. I don't want to manually enter single tempo
> changes in ardour

I think he means putting several decreasing tempo markers for your accelerando to ardour's timeline, then re-record hydrogen while both sync to jack transport - then hydrogen should follow ardour's tempo and there would be no need for timestretching...

Edgar

> 
> meanwhile I'm looking into klick, it seems it should work (though can't
> get it to sync to jack transport ATM) - but this way the tempo changes
> will not get recorded into ardour... i.e. every time I press play I
> should also somehow start klick...
> 
> renato
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
> 



More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list