[LAU] progressive time stretch

Will Godfrey willgodfrey at musically.me.uk
Sat Feb 15 17:28:46 UTC 2014


On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:15:24 +0100
Renato <rennabh at gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:03:07 +0100
> Edgar Aichinger <edogawa at aon.at> wrote:
> 
> > Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 23:57:04 schrieb Renato:
> > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:29 +0100
> > > raf <rmouneyres at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > i'd recommend to create a tempo map (vs timestreching which would
> > > > lead to artefacts) As you mention recording in ardour, you could
> > > > use it to create the tempo map,
> > > 
> > > hi, what is a "tempo map" and how do you create it in ardour?
> > > couldn't find anything about it. I don't want to manually enter
> > > single tempo changes in ardour
> > 
> > I think he means putting several decreasing tempo markers for your
> > accelerando to ardour's timeline, then re-record hydrogen while both
> > sync to jack transport - then hydrogen should follow ardour's tempo
> > and there would be no need for timestretching...
> > 
> 
> well yeah that was my idea from the start... probably I should have
> be more clear (and not use "time stretch" in the subject). The problem
> is that manually inputing tempo changes won't give a smooth enough
> accelerando, and it's not a very nice way of doing things anyway. I'm
> looking for a more automated solution
> 
> Does anyone know if the script klick2ardour.py is supposed to work with
> ardour 3 sessions? It does nothing to my session
Don't know if this is any help, but in the current version of Rosegarden you
can mark a starting tempo and a finishing tempo and tell it to slowly go from
one to the other. You can go either faster or slower, and set as many markers
as you like.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list