[LAU] which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

[Karen Lewellen]

Why did this discussion shift to my hardware synthesizer when I am asking 
about  distributions specifically written for audio professionals?
Let me post a link to an article  that illustrates what I am asking about.
Linux does not support the reading edge, since you asked.
Kare


On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, F. Silvain wrote:

> Hey hey Kare,
> not having followed the thread completely, I'd like to say this: I use Debian 
> Squeeze and it works. There are enough commandline tools. ArchLinux seems to 
> offer an even better commandline structure in some ways. I'm not sure about 
> Nama and Midish for ArchLinux, I know, that there is a Nama package for 
> Debian. In any case, you'd need to update this manually to the most recent 
> version to have some real fun.
>
> I'm not sure about lowlatency kernels for Debian and Arch. But I think, you 
> can get a lowlatency kernel from Ubuntu for Debian, though it might be a 
> little awkward. I'm usng a standard kernel and the latency is quite OK.
>
> Which hardware synth do you use for speec? If it was supported by Linux, it 
> usually still is, they rarely throw stuff away. :) Support would either be 
> directly in the kernel or in BRLTTY, the braille driver. It not only supports 
> braille displays, but also speech hard- and software.
>
> Espeak, the free Linux speech synth, is not very pleasant, but usable.
>
> Ta-ta
> ----
> Ffanci
> * Homepage: https://freeshell.de/~silvain
> * Twitter:  http://twitter.com/ffanci_silvain
> * GitHub:   https://github.com/fsilvain
>
>
>