[LAU] which lau distro is more commandline friendly?
jonetsu at teksavvy.com
jonetsu at teksavvy.com
Tue Dec 22 02:38:35 UTC 2015
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:16:15 -0500 (EST)
Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net> wrote:
> Regardless, based on what I do with my
> main computer, the box will be firmly run via ssh TELNET.
Why would you access the machine remotely ?
Technically speaking there is no such thing as ssh telnet. These two
are different, ssh being secure, telnet not secure.
> No thoughts between those specific professional audio distributions?
If it is professional, then they will charge for it. So these are not
professional products per se.
> If they are interchangeable, then I may seek out avlinux since my
> understanding is it is Debian based.
KXStudio is based on Ubuntu packages, which in turn is based on Debian.
> I wanted to keep squeeze because I have a full set of discs for it,
> but the Latency discussion has me wondering since low latency Kernels
> are a must, at least for me, where the pro audio work is concerned.
> Kare
As I have replied a few minutes ago, I have never looked out for
latency except perhaps 12 years ago. All current kernels are OK to
make music, record projects using plugins, render, etc that is, on a
recent machine. So it depends on the machine.
More information about the Linux-audio-user
mailing list