[LAU] which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

[jonetsu at teksavvy.com]

On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:50:04 +0100
Raffaele Morelli <raffaele.morelli at gmail.com> wrote:

> AGain, you are completely missing the "long term support" thing and
> mixing apples and oranges, LTS are freezed in terms of new features
> upgrades. On the opposite a non LTS release is not freezed so
> dependencies are kept up-to-date.

I run a LTS now and jackd must be upgraded.  For Ardour to export
reliably. Not so easy.  It will be done, but cycles will be spent.
Might as well go for a non-LTS next time, such as KXStudio.

> Nope, you can change login shell whenever you want, bash is just the
> default one. man chsh

Sure, it is possible to choose one that will be the hardest to learn and
hardest to find solutions, if needed, since much less people are using
it. bash is the most common, is commonly found in major distros and
makes perfect sense when someone that sounds like a beginner asks for
general advice.