[LAU] which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 20:53:24 -0500 (EST), Karen Lewellen wrote:
>after all if every artist created in the same fashion  we would have
>no Michael Angelo's would we?

Just out of curiosity, in what way did Michelangelo used artistic tools
in an absurd unusual way?

You mention a common work-flow with proprietary GUI software and
mentions that you expect such a work-flow for your special, unusual
"Michael Angelo" alike Linux work-flow. Your claims are illogical, your
questions are cloudy.

Actually you never asked a smart question. A lot of people try to
answer your questions and you just got arsey to them.

http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>Shellworld is a comparative Unix based command line.  For example i
>know nano, and Pico its older edition.  have run screen in the past
>etc. Far less to my tastes, I use comparative shells in other editions,
>Ubuntu for example.

What "comparative shells" did you use with Ubuntu? What are you talking
about? How could we help you, if just claim something without gioving
more information.

>However the uniqueness about Linux and Unix is just how individually
>things can be configured.

If you wish to configure your real-time capable Linux usable, then
there isn't much choice, even not for Michelangelo alike genii.

>scripting yes, i know someone willing and able to do this for me, so
>that I am, for me, working form a firm base, leaving me to focus
>totally on learning how to use the tools I feel will allow me to make
>music as I desire.

You still seems not to understand how command line does work, since
this sentence doesn't make sense. It's one of your illogical claims. If
you are willing to learn how to use command line tools, then it's the
same as learning how to write scripts. This aren't two separated things.